ArticlePloS one2025
Chlorophyll inversion in rice based on visible light images of different planting methods.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a key substance for crop photosynthesis, chlorophyll content is closely related to crop growth and health. Inversion of chlorophyll content using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) visible light images can provide a theoretical basis for crop growth monitoring and health diagnosis. We used rice at the tasseling stage as the research object and obtained UAV visible orthophotos of two experimental fields planted manually (experimental area A) and mechanically (experimental area B), respectively. We constructed 14 vegetation indices and 15 texture features and utilized the correlation coefficient method to analyze them comprehensively. Then, four vegetation indices and four texture features were selected from them as feature variables to be added into three models, namely, K-neighborhood (KNN), decision tree (DT), and AdaBoost, respectively, for inverting chlorophyll content in experimental areas A and B. In the KNN model, the inversion model built with BGRI as the independent variable in region A has the highest accuracy, with R2 of 0.666 and RSME of 0.79; the inversion model built with RGRI as the independent variable in region B has the highest accuracy, with R2 of 0.729 and RSME of 0.626. In the DT model, the inversion model built with B-variance as the independent variable in region A has the highest accuracy, with R2 of 0.840 and RSME of 0.464; the inversion model built with G-mean as the independent variable in region B has the highest accuracy, with R2 of 0.845 and RSME of 0.530. In the AdaBoost model, the inversion model built with R-skewness as the independent variable in region A has the highest accuracy, with R2 of 0.826 and RSME of 0.642; the inversion model established with g as the independent variable in area B had the highest accuracy, with R2 of 0.879 and RSME of 0.599. In the comprehensive analysis, the best inversion models for experimental areas A and B were B-variance-decision tree and g-AdaBoost, respectively, whose models can quickly and accurately carry out the inversion of chlorophyll content of rice, and provide a theoretical basis for the monitoring of the crop's growth and health under different cultivation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.