Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126890›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2025

The Design of a Randomized Controlled Active Comparator Strategy Trial for Gout: Treat to Target Serum Urate Versus Treat to Avoid Symptoms.

Daniel H Solomon, Misti Paudel, Shravani Chitineni, Ana Fernandes, Tammy Pham, Shreya Billa, Chio Yokose, Kiara Tan, Julien J Dedier, Maureen D Dubreuil and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Controversies in Urate-Lowering Therapy for Gout: A Comprehensive Review.Gout, urate, and crystal deposition disease · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Daniel H SolomonBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Misti PaudelBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-0650
Shravani ChitineniBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ana FernandesMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Tammy PhamBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shreya BillaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chio YokoseMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7557-3303
Kiara TanMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Julien J DedierBoston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maureen D DubreuilBoston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-1515
John D FitzgeraldUniversity of California, Los Angeles and Los Angles VA Health System.
Sally L HodderWest Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown.
Tuhina NeogiBoston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9515-1711
Michael H PillingerNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3168-1542
Kevin R RiggsUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Kenneth G SaagUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Paul G ShekelleUniversity of California, Los Angeles and Los Angles VA Health System.
Zoe TsengBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael ToproverNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-0232
David S WeiNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Michael J BarryMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Hyon K ChoiMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Funding

Treat-to-Target Serum Urate versus Treat-to-Avoid Symptoms in Gout: A Randomized Controlled Trial (TRUST)U01AR080985 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MICHAEL J BARRY, HYON K CHOI · 2023 to 2026
$7.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR080985NIH HHS U01AR080985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveControversy persists regarding the optimal management of gout in routine primary care. There is a lack of clarity on whether treating to a target serum urate (TTT-SU) versus treating to avoid symptoms (TTASx) is more effective.

methodsWe designed a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial aimed at patients in primary care who have known gout, have elevated SU levels, and had at least one flare in the previous 12 months. The trial was designed to be pragmatic and incorporated structured input from primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and patients. The TTASx strategy group will receive weeklong courses of typical therapies for gout flares, such as colchicine, naproxen, or an oral glucocorticoid. The TTT-SU strategy group will receive urate-lowering therapy (primarily allopurinol) with dose titration to maintain an SU level <6 mg/dL, colchicine (or naproxen) prophylaxis for the first six months of urate-lowering therapy, and access to the same flare therapies as the TTASx group. Two clinicians (nurses or physicians) per site will be trained in each strategy to manage the patients in each arm without contamination. Gout flares are the primary outcome and are assessed every two weeks by trained study staff masked to treatment assignment using a validated questionnaire. The secondary outcome is quality of life. Blood pressure control, kidney function, glycemic control, and coronary atherosclerosis are exploratory secondary outcomes.

resultsSeveral sites have started prescreening using automated search strategies in their patients' electronic health records. Of the first 1,381 patients found in primary care practices with a history of gout, 691 patients (50%) passed prescreening checks. These potentially eligible participants have a median age of 67 years, 85% are men, median SU levels are 7.2 mg/dL, and 18% are taking low dosages of allopurinol. These patients have been targeted for recruitment efforts that are underway now.

conclusionThis randomized controlled active comparator strategy trial will answer a key question in the treatment of patients with gout in primary care: the comparative effectiveness of TTT-SU versus TTASx in gout. Secondary and exploratory outcomes will add important information regarding the broader extra-articular and quality-of-life effects of lowering SU levels.

Identifiers

PMID40126890
PMCPMC11932158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.