Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126866›Full record

ArticleHuman nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)2025

The Nature, Taxonomy, and Contingencies of Intimate Relationship Problems.

Menelaos Apostolou, Loizos Katsaris, Antonios Kagialis, Loukia Constantinidou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Menelaos ApostolouDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, 46 Makedonitissas Ave, Nicosia, 1700, Cyprus. m.apostolou@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-1848
Loizos KatsarisDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, 46 Makedonitissas Ave, Nicosia, 1700, Cyprus.
Antonios KagialisDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Loukia ConstantinidouDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, 46 Makedonitissas Ave, Nicosia, 1700, Cyprus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intimate relationships are frequently characterized by problems, which the current research aimed to identify. We first proposed an evolutionary theoretical framework to understand the nature of intimate relationship problems. Subsequently, we employed a mixed-methods approach to identify these problems. In particular, Study 1 used a combination of qualitative research methods on a sample of 258 Greek-speaking participants and identified 153 relationship problems. Study 2 used quantitative research methods on a sample of 783 Greek-speaking participants and classified them into 14 broader categories. The most common problems were a poor sex life, followed by incompatibility and neglect. Other common problems included a partner's bad character, fear of abandonment, and lack of shared fun and recreation. Lack of loyalty and respect, disagreement over family planning, and privacy invasion were the least common problems in our sample. Both sexes reported similar problems, while the length of the relationship was not significantly associated with the presence of different relationship problems. Additionally, participants' age, children, cohabitation, and relationship status were associated with some of the identified relationship problems.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAdolescentAdultFemaleGreeceHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung AdultIntimate relationshipsMatingNature of relationship problemsRelationship problems

Identifiers

PMID40126866
PMCPMC12058819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.