ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2025
Xpert MTB/XDR Assay for Detection of Resistance to Isoniazid, Fluoroquinolone, Aminoglycoside, and Ethionamide Among Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Bangladesh.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEarly detection of drug resistance in patients with tuberculosis (TB) is crucial for prompt and effective treatment. This study evaluated the performance of Xpert MTB/XDR assay (Xpert XDR) for detecting resistance to isoniazid (INH), fluoroquinolones (FLQ), aminoglycosides (AMG), and ethionamide (ETH) in patients with pulmonary TB (PTB) in Bangladesh.
methodsXpert XDR was performed on sputum samples from 793 Xpert MTB/RIF positive patients with PTB enrolled between April 2021 and March 2023. Results were compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility test (pDST) performed on Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) media for the detection of resistance to INH, FLQ, AMG, and ETH. The performance of the assay was also compared between newly diagnosed or rifampicin (RIF)-sensitive versus re-treated or RIF-resistant patients with PTB.
resultsOf 793 samples tested by Xpert XDR, indeterminate results for INH, FLQ, AMG, and ETH were observed for 3 (0.4%), 5 (0.6%), 33 (4.2%), and 0 (0%) isolates, respectively. The assay's sensitivity and specificity compared to pDST was 94.0% (95% CI 90.5-96.4; 264/281) and 97.3% (95% CI 95.4-98.5; 495/509), respectively for INH; 86.0% (95% CI 78.2-91.8; 98/114) and 99.3% (95% CI 98.3-99.3; 669/674), respectively for FLQ; 85.7% (95% CI 42.1-99.6; 6/7) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.3-100.0; 752/753), respectively for AMG; and 25.0% (95% CI 19.0-31.7; 48/192) and 96.7% (95% CI 94.9-98.0; 581/601), respectively for ETH. Agreement of Xpert XDR with pDST was almost perfect for detecting resistance to INH, FLQ, and AMG (kappa: 0.91, 0.89, and 0.86, respectively), but fair for ETH (kappa: 0.28). Xpert XDR performed significantly better among re-treated or RIF-resistant patients with TB compared to newly diagnosed or RIF-sensitive cases.
conclusionsGiven the high performance, Xpert XDR assay can be programmatically implemented nationwide for rapid and accurate detection of resistance to INH, FLQ, and AMG in patients with PTB, aiding clinicians in selecting appropriate regimens for the treatment of drug-resistant TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.