ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
Rapid Start of HIV Antiretroviral Therapy in New York State.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating B/F/TAF at the first HIV-specialist appointment in antiretroviral naive persons living with HIV: the bifast study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid start of antiretroviral therapy (ART) after an HIV diagnosis is a novel approach with demonstrated benefits for HIV care. However, utilization of this approach remains poor in the United States. Using retrospective reviews of HIV clinical care data from the New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute's Quality of Care Program, we examined changes in rapid start of ART from 2019 to 2022 to assess the degree to which the rapid start model is being realized in the state. We also identified patient-level factors associated with delayed initiation and examined associations between time to treatment initiation and viral load suppression. We found that rapid initiation increased steadily across the years examined but differed depending on where patients received care and whether they were initially diagnosed by the data-reporting organization or by an external medical organization or testing center. We also found that rapid start varied across several patient-level factors, which also depended on whether patients were initially diagnosed by the data-reporting organization or by an external medical organization or testing center. Finally, 67.8% of patients who initiated ART on the same day of HIV diagnosis and 69.7% of patients who started ART within seven days of diagnosis were virally suppressed within 91 days of diagnosis, compared to 42.9% of patients who initiated ART between 31 and 91 days. Increased utilization of the rapid start model over time and strong associations between rapid start and timely viral suppression suggest that further uptake of this strategy would likely advance progress towards Ending the Epidemic and health equity goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.