ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
High Preference for Injectable Pre-exposure Prophylaxis among Young Women in Kenya.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Longer acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) products are effective options for HIV prevention that require less user-dependence. As programs are preparing to launch delivery of these longer acting products, it is important to understand users' needs and preferences. We conducted a cross-sectional study among women seeking services at 12 family planning clinics in Kisumu, Kenya. Participants were sexually active HIV-negative women ≥15 years, with at least one characteristic that is more common among women who acquire HIV. We assessed PrEP product preferences among PrEP-experienced and inexperienced women. We used descriptive statistics to summarize participants' characteristics, product preferences, and willingness to use different PrEP modalities. We used univariate and multivariate models to assess factors related to preferences for injectable PrEP. A total of 457 participants were enrolled, including 341 with no oral PrEP experience and 116 with recent oral PrEP experience. The median age was 26 [IQR:23-30], 83% were married or cohabiting and 31% reported using injectable contraceptives. Among participants without prior PrEP experience, 74% preferred injectable PrEP, 19% preferred oral PrEP, and 4% preferred the vaginal ring. Among previous oral PrEP users, 82% preferred injectable PrEP, 16% preferred oral PrEP, and only 2% preferred the dapivirine vaginal ring. Only perceived PrEP stigma was significantly associated with injectable PrEP preference (PR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.09, 1.37, P=0.001). Reproductive-age women in Kenya have a strong interest in long-acting injectable PrEP. Product rollout and implementation needs to consider women's preference and devise best approaches to deliver injectable PrEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40126743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.