Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126710›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2025

Emotion and motion: superior memory for emotional but not for moving stimuli.

Adam W Cox, Paul Foret-Bruno, Inés Tchekemian Lanaspa, Isabella Zsoldos, Patrick S R Davidson, Hanna Chainay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam W CoxSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Paul Foret-BrunoLaboratoire d'Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Inés Tchekemian LanaspaLaboratoire d'Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Isabella ZsoldosLaboratoire d'Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Patrick S R DavidsonSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Hanna ChainayLaboratoire d'Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France. hanna.chainay@univ-lyon2.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two effects on memory have been described in the literature: the emotional enhancement of memory (EEM) (i.e., an emotional stimulus is better remembered than a neutral stimulus) and the dynamic superiority effect (DSE) (i.e., a moving visual stimulus is better remembered than a static stimulus). However, the DSE has previously only been studied using complex visual stimuli (e.g., video clips). Thus, the first objective of the present study was to examine whether the DSE will be observed with simple visual stimuli (i.e., isolated moving stimuli). The second objective was to examine whether people's emotional memory will be affected by stimulus motion. We conducted three experiments, two using a free recall task, Experiment 1A (online) and 1B (in-person), and one using a recognition task (in-person). Participants viewed negative, positive, and neutral stimuli in two motion conditions, dynamic and static, and then had to recall or recognize them. In all three experiments, we observed an EEM but no DSE. Thus, our data verify that emotions affect memory performance but provide no evidence of motion effects on memory of simple stimuli.

Indexed as

EmotionsMental RecallMotion PerceptionRecognition, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultDynamic superiority effectEmotionEmotional enhancement of memoryMemoryMovement

Identifiers

PMID40126710
PMCPMC11933217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.