ArticleExperimental brain research2025
The impact of a two-hour endurance run on brain activity monitored over 24 h.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task evoked EEG reveals neural processing differences in aphantasia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effects of acute and chronic exercise on working memory in healthy adults. An experimental investigation.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute exercise has been shown to enhance cognitive abilities, particularly those governed by the prefrontal cortex, such as executive function. However, the effects of prolonged exercise on cognition and brain activity, especially over extended recovery periods, remain underexplored. This pilot study investigated the effects of two hours of moderate-intensity running on oscillatory brain activity and working memory performance, monitored across a 24-hour recovery period-an interval not previously studied. Using electroencephalography (EEG) and a 2-back task, resting-state brain activity and task-specific frontal theta power were assessed. While task accuracy and reaction times showed no significant changes, frontal theta power increased one hour post-exercise, reflecting heightened cognitive effort. Resting-state EEG demonstrated a sustained increase in high-alpha power, which persisted until the 24-hour mark and indicated cortical recovery processes. While limited by the lack of a control group, these findings suggest that prolonged moderate-intensity exercise may elicit complex and delayed neurophysiological responses, supporting recovery and neural resilience in trained individuals. Therefore, our research offers new insights into the interplay between exercise, cognition, and recovery, with implications for optimizing performance in physically demanding contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40126627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.