ArticleUrolithiasis2025
Understanding the clinical genetics of kidney stone disease using the Natera Renasight panel.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to characterize the underlying genetics of kidney stone disease (KSD) in an urban and diverse population using the Natera Renasight genetic panel. This was a single-center prospective study of high-risk KSD patients, defined as recurrent stone formers or those with a family history with KSD. Buccal saliva DNA samples were collected with the commercially available Natera Renasight genetic panel and were analyzed using next-generation sequencing. The panel assesses 385 kidney disease related genes, including 45 linked to KSD. One hundred eleven high-risk KSD patients were enrolled. The majority were female (56%) with a median age of 50 (IQR 39.5-59.5), compromising a diverse ethnic background with 62% Hispanic, 23% White and 11% Black. Patients had median 3 (IQR 2-5) lifetime stone episodes, and 41% had family history of KSD. Genetic analysis was possible for 105 patients (95%). Eight (8%) had positive tests with only one patient found to have a pathogenic mutation associated with KSD (SLC7A9, cystinuria). The other 7 positive tests included amyloidosis (TTR, N = 3), Alport syndrome (COL4A3, N = 2), polycystic kidney disease (PKD1, N = 1), and susceptibility to ESRD (APOL1, N = 1). Patients with positive tests were more likely to have chronic kidney disease (38% vs 5%, p < 0.01), gout (13% vs 1%, p = 0.02) and carbonate apatite stones (38% vs 7%, p < 0.01). Our study sheds light on genetic factors of KSD in a diverse patient population. The results suggest that KSD is unlikely monogenetic in nature, but is more likely due to a complex interplay of polygenetic and environmental influences. Genetic testing may be most useful in KSD patients with chronic kidney disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.