ArticleFamilies, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare2025
Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives: A qualitative study on community health clinic team member perspectives.
Article in Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHealth care organizations have recognized the necessity of addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related issues to promote anti-racism and improve workplace culture. Little is known about the short- and long-term impacts on staff perceptions of inclusion, psychological safety, and belongingness, or what aspects of DEI initiatives hold meaning and value for team members. In particular, the perspective of clinical staff identifying as racial-ethnic minorities/persons of color (POC), who disproportionately occupy support staff roles with less power on the team, has been unclear and understudied. The purpose of this study was to investigate what makes organizational DEI efforts meaningful and impactful in creating a sense of inclusion for POC clinic team members and identifies perceived barriers to inclusion efforts.
methodA qualitative study was conducted across 13 community health clinics within a safety-net health care system in Colorado. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 participants (77.5% female;
resultsFindings illustrated elements of existing DEI initiatives, ranging from the most beneficial to the most detrimental, including some common across all participant groups and some unique to specific races and/or role groups. DISCUSSION: All participants endorsed common beneficial elements of DEI initiatives. Participants identifying as POC and in roles with less power in the clinic (i.e., support staff members) shared elements with the potential to cause harm. Avoiding detrimental elements and incorporating beneficial elements will allow teams to engage in meaningful DEI initiatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.