Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126550›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Factors Influencing Primary Care Physicians' Intent to Refer Patients With Hypertension to a Digital Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Program: Mixed Methods Study.

Jennifer J Wu, Ross Graham, Julie Çelebi, Kevin Fraser, Geneen T Gin, Laurel Dang, Esmatullah Hatamy, Amanda Walker, Courtney Barbato, Ottar Lunde and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jennifer J Wu *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9010-9622
Ross Graham *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4578-7022
Julie Çelebi *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8014-5204
Kevin Fraser *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3001-4299
Geneen T Gin *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8438-5830
Laurel Dang *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4120-9497
Esmatullah Hatamy *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4607-727X
Amanda Walker *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5777-6684
Courtney Barbato *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7655-871X
Ottar LundeDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-1271
Lisa ColesCommunity Care, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4379-2252
Parag AgnihotriDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6798-5671
Cassandra MornDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4170-6409
Ming Tai-Seale *Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-066X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care physicians' (PCP) referral rates to digital health programs are highly variable. This study explores whether knowledge of the digital remote blood pressure monitoring (RBPM) program and information on referral patterns influence PCPs' intention to refer patients.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the relationship between PCPs' knowledge of the digital RBPM program and information on their own prior referral rates versus their own with their peers' referral rates and their likelihood to refer patients to the digital RBPM program.

methodsThis is a mixed methods study integrating quantitative analysis of electronic health record data regarding the frequency of PCPs' referrals of patients with hypertension to a digital health program and quantitative and qualitative analyses of survey data about PCPs' knowledge of the program and their intention to refer patients. PCPs responded to a clinical vignette featuring an eligible patient. They were randomized to either receive their own referral rate or their own plus their peers' referral rate. They were assessed on their intent to refer eligible future patients. Descriptive and multivariable linear regression analyses examined participant characteristics and the factors associated with their intent to refer patients. Narrative reasons for their intention to refer were thematically analyzed.

resultsOf the 242 eligible PCPs invited to participate, 31% (n=70) responded to the survey. From electronic health record data, the mean referral rate of patients per PCP was 11.80% (SD 13.30%). The mean self-reported knowledge of the digital health program was 6.47 (SD 1.81). The mean likelihood of referring an eligible patient (on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being not at all, and 10 being definitely) based on a vignette was 8.54 (SD 2.12). The own referral data group's mean likelihood to refer was 8.91 (SD 1.28), whereas the own plus peer prior referral data group was 8.35 (SD 2.19). Regression analyses suggested the intention to refer the vignette patient was significantly associated with their knowledge (coefficient 0.46, 95% CI 0.20-0.73; P<.001), whereas the intention to refer future patients was significantly associated with their intent to refer the patient in the vignette (coefficient 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.78; P<.001). No evidence of association was found on receiving own plus peer referral data compared with own referral data and intent to refer future patients (coefficient 0.23, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.89; P=.48).

conclusionsPhysicians' intention to refer patients to a novel digital health program can be extrapolated by examining their intention to refer an eligible patient portrayed in a vignette, which was found to be significantly influenced by their knowledge of the program. Future efforts should engage PCPs to better inform them so that more patients can benefit from the digital health program.

Indexed as

HypertensionPhysicians, Primary CareReferral and ConsultationAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMiddle Agedclinical informationdigital healthdigital technologyelectronic health recordshypertensionlinear regressionmixed methodmobile phoneprimary carequantitative analysisreferralremote blood pressureremote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40126550
PMCPMC11976174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.