Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126534›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Lessons Learned From European Health Data Projects With Cancer Use Cases: Implementation of Health Standards and Internet of Things Semantic Interoperability.

Amelie Gyrard, Somayeh Abedian, Philip Gribbon, George Manias, Rick van Nuland, Kurt Zatloukal, Irina Emilia Nicolae, Gabriel Danciu, Septimiu Nechifor, Luis Marti-Bonmati and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CancerWatch: accelerating Europe's cancer intelligence.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026
    Article
  2. Regulatory science for AI-basedJournal of pathology informatics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Amelie GyrardTrialog, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3938-5617
Somayeh AbedianLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-6941
Philip GribbonDiscovery Research - ScreeningPort, Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7655-2459
George ManiasDepartment of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0128-2022
Rick van NulandLygature, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1659-274X
Kurt ZatloukalDiagnostic and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-7218
Irina Emilia NicolaeSiemens Foundational Technologies, Brasov, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-8467
Gabriel DanciuSiemens Foundational Technologies, Brasov, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8561-1171
Septimiu NechiforSiemens Foundational Technologies, Brasov, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5727-6081
Luis Marti-BonmatiLa Fe University Hospital Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8234-010X
Pedro MallolLa Fe University Hospital Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3839-3324
Stefano DalmianiMonasterio Research Hospitals, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2010-9164
Serge AutexierDeutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0769-0732
Mario JendrossekHealth Data Hub, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6523-4310
Ioannis AvramidisUbitech, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3242-3097
Eva Garcia AlvarezBiobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure - European Research Infrastructure Consortium, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3522-5088
Petr HolubBiobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure - European Research Infrastructure Consortium, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-616X
Ignacio BlanquerUniversitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1692-8922
Anna BodenDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Centre for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0128-870X
Rada HusseinLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1257-4848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoption of the European Health Data Space (EHDS) regulation has made integrating health data critical for both primary and secondary applications. Primary use cases include patient diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment, while secondary applications support research, innovation, and regulatory decision-making. Additionally, leveraging large datasets improves training quality for artificial intelligence (AI) models, particularly in cancer prevention, prediction, and treatment personalization. The European Union (EU) has recently funded multiple projects under Europe's Beating Cancer Plan. However, these projects face challenges related to fragmentation and the lack of standardization in metadata, data storage, access, and processing. This paper examines interoperability standards used in six EU-funded cancer-related projects: IDERHA (Integration of Heterogeneous Data and Evidence Towards Regulatory and Health Technology Assessments Acceptance), EUCAIM (European Cancer Imaging Initiative), ASCAPE (Artificial Intelligence Supporting Cancer Patients Across Europe), iHelp, BigPicture, and the HealthData@EU pilot. These initiatives aim to enhance the analysis of heterogeneous health data while aligning with EHDS implementation, specifically for the EHDS for the secondary use of data (EHDS2). Between October 2023 and July 2024, we organized meetings and workshops among these projects to assess how they adopt health standards and apply Internet of Things (IoT) semantic interoperability. The discussions focused on interoperability standards for health data, knowledge graphs, the data quality framework, patient-generated health data, AI reasoning, federated approaches, security, and privacy. Based on our findings, we developed a template for designing the EHDS2 interoperability framework in alignment with the new European Interoperability Framework (EIF) and EHDS governance standards. This template maps EHDS2-recommended standards to the EIF model and principles, linking the proposed EHDS2 data quality framework to relevant International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards. Using this template, we analyzed and compared how the recommended EHDS2 standards were implemented across the studied projects. During workshops, project teams shared insights on overcoming interoperability challenges and their innovative approaches to bridging gaps in standardization. With support from HSbooster.eu, we facilitated collaboration among these projects to exchange knowledge on standards, legal implementation, project sustainability, and harmonization with EHDS2. The findings from this work, including the created template and lessons learned, will be compiled into an interactive toolkit for the EHDS2 interoperability framework. This toolkit will help existing and future projects align with EHDS2 technical and legal requirements, serving as a foundation for a common EHDS2 interoperability framework. Additionally, standardization efforts include participation in the development of ISO/IEC 21823-3:2021-Semantic Interoperability for IoT Systems. Since no ISO standard currently exists for digital pathology and AI-based image analysis for medical diagnostics, the BigPicture project is contributing to ISO/PWI 24051-2, which focuses on digital pathology and AI-based, whole-slide image analysis. Integrating these efforts with ongoing ISO initiatives can enhance global standardization and facilitate widespread adoption across health care systems.

Indexed as

Health Information InteroperabilityInternet of ThingsNeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceEuropeHumansSemanticsAIartificial intelligencecancercancer use casesdecision-makingdiagnosisEuropean Health Data Spacehealth care standardshealth dataInternet of ThingsinteroperabilityIoTprimary dataprognosis

Identifiers

PMID40126534
PMCPMC11976176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.