Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126501›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Decreases in overall light level increase the severity of the reverse Pulfrich effect.

Victor Rodriguez-Lopez, Benjamin M Chin, Johannes Burge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victor Rodriguez-LopezInstitute of Optics, Spanish National Research Council (IO-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Benjamin M ChinDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Johannes BurgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CLAIRE H MITCHELL · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Estimation and Discrimination of Motion and Depth in Natural ScenesR01EY028571 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BURGE, JOHANNES D. · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pulfrich effect is an illusion characterized by the misperception of the depth and 3D direction of moving objects. Interocular luminance differences cause the classic Pulfrich effect; the darker image is processed more slowly. Interocular blur differences cause the reverse Pulfrich effect; the blurrier image is processed more quickly. A common correction for presbyopia-monovision-intentionally induces the optical conditions that cause the reverse Pulfrich effect. The effect sizes, and the fact that tens of millions of people wear these corrections every day, raise concerns about public safety. However, although the impact of overall light level (e.g., nighttime vs. daytime) on the classic Pulfrich effect has been well characterized, its impact on the reverse Pulfrich effect is unknown. Here, using a custom binocular 4f tunable lens optical system that allows the decoupling of retinal illuminance and retinal blur, we report how the classic and reverse Pulfrich effects scale with overall light level. Both effects increase logarithmically with decreases in light level. These results motivate a characterization of how light level interacts with other optical factors (e.g., higher-order aberrations) that are likely to impact the reverse Pulfrich effect and, hence, the perceptual consequences of monovision corrections.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionLightLightingMotion PerceptionOptical IllusionsPresbyopiaVision, BinocularHumansPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40126501
PMCPMC11951055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.