ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Evaluation of Suprachoroidal Injection in Cadaveric and Preclinical Models.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the Orbit® subretinal delivery system (Orbit® SDS device) and prototypes in adult and juvenile canine eyes.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Custom-Made Injector for Suprachoroidal Ocular Delivery: Effect of Intraocular Pressure, Volume, and Location on the Distribution of Aqueous Solutions in Rabbits.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2025Article
- Near-Real Surgical Specimens (NRSS): A Novel Platform for Standardized Assessment of Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The suprachoroidal space (SCS) is a new route for delivering therapeutics to the posterior eye. Reliably reaching the SCS is difficult in humans and animal models and necessitates thorough validation of drug delivery techniques. This study quantified SCS coverage in human cadaveric eyes using micro-computed tomography (μCT) and developed injectors optimized for preclinical animal anatomy resulting in reliable SCS access. Methods: Dynamic μCT captured volumetric images during a 100 µL SCS injection in 10 cadaveric human eyes from five donors. Quantitative measurements of injection coverage, thickness, distribution, and center of volume were calculated. To improve preclinical SCS delivery, our novel TS-Micro injector was scaled to accommodate non-human primate (NHP) anatomy. Devices were tested in vivo (30 total injections, 14 animals) where delivery success was evaluated via direct visualization, and intraoperative imaging. Results: Delivery to the SCS was successful in 100% of uncompromised human cadaver eyes (80% of all eyes). Injections of 100 µL in human SCS covered 33.3% ± 5.9%. Four-dimensional μCT showed that infusate initially spreads circumferentially from the injection point then posteriorly. Delivery to NHP eyes was successful in 95% of procedures resulting in coverage consistent to human cadaveric testing. Conclusions: Results provide the first quantifiable measurement of SCS injection spread in human anatomy with validation of suprachoroidal drug delivery in the NHP that mirrors coverage in human. Translational Relevance: Cell and gene therapies require precise delivery for therapeutic efficacy, necessitating quantification of delivery in preclinical and human anatomy, as inaccurate delivery impacts efficacy of drug candidates and confounds toxicology/dose range studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.