Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126342›Full record

ArticleNon-coding RNA2025

Secondary-Structure-Informed RNA Inverse Design via Relational Graph Neural Networks.

Amirhossein Manzourolajdad, Mohammad Mohebbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Non-coding RNA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amirhossein ManzourolajdadDepartment of Computer Science, State University of New York Polytechnic Institute, 100 Seymour Rd., Utica, NY 13502, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1217-1371
Mohammad MohebbiDepartment of Computer Science and Information Science, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, GA 30597, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3337-0695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA inverse design is an essential part of many RNA therapeutic strategies. To date, there have been great advances in computationally driven RNA design. The current machine learning approaches can predict the sequence of an RNA given its 3D structure with acceptable accuracy and at tremendous speed. The design and engineering of RNA regulators such as riboswitches, however, is often more difficult, partly due to their inherent conformational switching abilities. Although recent state-of-the-art models do incorporate information about the multiple structures that a sequence can fold into, there is great room for improvement in modeling structural switching. In this work, a relational geometric graph neural network is proposed that explicitly incorporates alternative structures to predict an RNA sequence. Converting the RNA structure into a geometric graph, the proposed model uses edge types to distinguish between the primary structure, secondary structure, and spatial positioning of the nucleotides in representing structures. The results show higher native sequence recovery rates over those of gRNAde across different test sets (eg. 72% vs. 66%) and a benchmark from the literature (60% vs. 57%). Secondary-structure edge types had a more significant impact on the sequence recovery than the spatial edge types as defined in this work. Overall, these results suggest the need for more complex and case-specific characterization of RNA for successful inverse design.

Indexed as

geometric deep learninggraph neural networksriboswitchesRNA inverse design

Identifiers

PMID40126342
PMCPMC11932209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.