Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126314›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Clinical and Operational Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pharmacy: A Narrative Review of Real-World Applications.

Maree Donna Simpson, Haider Saddam Qasim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maree Donna SimpsonSchool of Dentistry and Medical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW 4118, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1370-4173
Haider Saddam QasimSchool of Computer Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past five years, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) including its significant subset, machine learning (ML), has significantly advanced pharmaceutical procedures in community pharmacies, hospital pharmacies, and pharmaceutical industry settings. Numerous notable healthcare institutions, such as Johns Hopkins University, Cleveland Clinic, and Mayo Clinic, have demonstrated measurable advancements in the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare delivery. Community pharmacies have seen a 40% increase in drug adherence and a 55% reduction in missed prescription refills since implementing artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. According to reports, hospital implementations have reduced prescription distribution errors by up to 75% and enhanced the detection of adverse medication reactions by up to 65%. Numerous businesses, such as Atomwise and Insilico Medicine, assert that they have made noteworthy progress in the creation of AI-based medical therapies. Emerging technologies like federated learning and quantum computing have the potential to boost the prediction of protein-drug interactions by up to 300%, despite challenges including high implementation costs and regulatory compliance. The significance of upholding patient-centred care while encouraging technology innovation is emphasised in this review.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical decision supportdrug discoveryhealthcare technologyimplementation analysismachine learningpatient safetypharmaceutical care

Identifiers

PMID40126314
PMCPMC11932220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.