Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126275›Full record

ArticleAudiology research2025

Communication Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss: A Comparison of Two Early Intervention Approaches.

Aisha Casoojee, Katijah Khoza-Shangase, Amisha Kanji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Audiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Communication Intervention in South Africa: Advocating for the Listening and Spoken Language Approach.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aisha CasoojeeDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Humanities, School of Human and Community Development, Braamfontein East Campus, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5700-0528
Katijah Khoza-ShangaseDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Humanities, School of Human and Community Development, Braamfontein East Campus, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6220-9606
Amisha KanjiDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Humanities, School of Human and Community Development, Braamfontein East Campus, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9577-4935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly intervention approaches play a critical role in shaping the communication outcomes of children with hearing loss, influencing their language development and overall learning trajectory.

objectivesThe main objective of this study was to compare the communication outcomes of children with hearing loss who received Listening and Spoken Language-South Africa (LSL-SA) with those who received Traditional Speech-Language Therapy (TSLT).

methodsA retrospective record review was conducted to gather data on communication outcomes from participants' speech-language therapy records. Communication outcomes were measured using standardized assessments evaluating speech intelligibility, expressive vocabulary, receptive language, expressive language, audition, and cognitive-linguistic skills. The data were analyzed using quantitative statistics. Key statistical methods included measures to determine associations, identify statistical significance, determine outcomes, and compare differences between the two groups.

resultsThe study found that children in the LSL-SA group had statistically significant better communication outcomes, with 63% achieving age-appropriate speech intelligibility compared to 45% in the TSLT group (

conclusionsThis study highlights that communication intervention approaches aligned with the LSL-SA practice promote better communication development and enhance spoken language outcomes in children with hearing loss, facilitating successful transitions to mainstream schooling. Contribution: This study provides contextually relevant evidence for implementing an LSL-SA intervention approach for children with hearing loss. The implications of these findings for clinical practice and future research are discussed in detail.

Indexed as

auditory–verbal therapycommunication outcomesearly hearing detection and interventionhearing lossinclusive educationlistening and spoken languageSouth Africaspeech-language therapy

Identifiers

PMID40126275
PMCPMC11932213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.