ArticleAudiology research2025
Long-Term Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation: Device "Aging" and Hearing Performance.
Article in Audiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Cochlear Implant Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Audiology research · 2026Review
- Causes and Challenges Regarding Explantation and Reimplantation in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and audiological outcomes in long-term cochlear implant (CI) users, focusing on hearing performance and device failures.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent CI surgery, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Device survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and failure rates were classified as device failure explants or medical-related explants. The time to revision and causes of reimplantation were assessed. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation for audiological outcomes, Student's
resultsIn this study, data from a total of 211 CIs were collected. Fourteen major postoperative complications were reported in this series, resulting in a global major complication rate of 6.6%: 5.2% due to hard failure and 1.4% due to medical problems and soft failure. The revision rate was 4.1% for the children's group and 10% for the adult group. The overall device survival rates were more than 96% at 10 years and 91% at 20 years. The median postoperative follow-up was 16.3 years. Moreover, a highly significant correlation was observed (r = 0.669,
conclusionsThe CI is a lifelong device; however, the technology is constantly evolving. Therefore, careful patient counseling (or counseling of parents in the case of pediatric patients) is necessary. The device may wear out over time, requiring revision surgery. These data are essential for audiologists and ENT specialists when selecting patients and determining surgical indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.