Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126248›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2025

Micro-Electrometric Method for Assessing Cholinesterase Activity in Human Whole Blood.

Nan Ei Moh Moh Kyi, Muhammad Samar, Surat Hongsibsong, Nootchakarn Sawarng, Supansa Pata, Anurak Wongta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nan Ei Moh Moh KyiSchool of Health Science Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Muhammad SamarSchool of Health Science Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Surat HongsibsongSchool of Health Science Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5510-5905
Nootchakarn SawarngDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Supansa PataDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associate Medical Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8529-4332
Anurak WongtaSchool of Health Science Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

Funding

Chiang Mai University R66IN00532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholinesterase (ChE) is an essential enzyme for nervous system function, and its activity in the blood serves as a biomarker for pesticide exposure, necessitating accessible assessment methods in resource-limited areas. This study focused on developing and validating a micro-electrometric method to rapidly and reliably measure ChE activity in human blood to monitor pesticide exposure. A micro-electrometric method was designed to evaluate ChE activity in whole-blood samples, involving incubation with organophosphate and carbamate pesticides and subsequent pH measurement, and its performance was compared to that of the Ellman method. The optimized method was strongly correlated with the Ellman method (R

Indexed as

carbamate detectioncholinesterase activitymicro-electrometric methodorganophosphoruspesticide exposure

Identifiers

PMID40126248
PMCPMC11932293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.