ArticleMethods and protocols2025
Development of a Reporting Guideline for Trochim's Concept Mapping.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical Activity Determinants Among Adolescents With Mild Intellectual Disability in Dutch Practical Education: Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Co-Creating an Intervention to Prevent Injuries in Police Force Recruits: A Concept Mapping Study of Police Force Recruits, Police Force Staff, Health Professionals, and Research Experts.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- Patient partnership in primary health care systems of the future: a structured priority setting exercise.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Coping strategies for compassion fatigue among health care professionals in intensive care units: a group concept mapping study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reporting guidelines are created with the intention to enhance the quality and transparency of reporting different research methods. Trochim's concept mapping (often referred to as group concept mapping) is a six-phase, participatory mixed-method approach to understanding complex constructs. Currently, there is no reporting guideline for concept mapping. Developing a reporting guideline typically follows a three-step process: 1. a systematic review to establish the need for a reporting guideline, 2. a Delphi study to identify candidate items, and 3. consolidation process to inform a draft guideline. We have previously reported our step 1, a systematic review of health-related concept mapping studies. In this paper, we report on steps 2 and 3, guideline development. In developing our reporting guideline, we opted to use concept mapping rather than the Delphi method. Stakeholders including researchers and experts in concept mapping were identified from papers included in our systematic review and invited to participate. Thirty-two stakeholders participated in the brainstorming phase of the concept mapping generating 96 discrete statements. The prioritisation and clustering phase involved 24 stakeholders. The final concept map included 11 clusters that represented key concepts for inclusion in the reporting guideline. The clusters were relatively small and positioned in a circle around the edge of the map, suggesting each was of equal importance and conceptually discreet. In phase 3, a guideline was drafted using the findings from both the phase 1 systematic review and phase 2 concept mapping study. The draft was reviewed by eight stakeholders (who had participated in our phase 2 concept mapping study) to check the completeness and clarity of expression of the items included in the guideline. The final reporting guideline (called the ConMapT) has 27-items organised under 14 headings. The guideline will be made freely available via the EQUATOR network. Registration: The study protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) before recruiting the first study participant. The EQUATOR network has listed the study as a guideline under development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.