ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Treatment decision-making and treatment experiences in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Satisfaction with treatment decision-making and long-term experiences of life-prolonging treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.BMC palliative care · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeFor the most advanced stage of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), several life-prolonging treatments have become available over the past decade. Treatment decision-making (TDM) and experiences in this phase are yet to be studied. Hence, this study aimed to describe men's satisfaction with TDM and treatment experiences during the first 12 months of a life-prolonging treatment of mCRPC. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis prospective study included 104 men with mCRPC who started and remained on the same life-prolonging treatment for 12 months. They received a questionnaire on TDM, treatment experiences, and well-being every 3 months. Correlation analyses explored associations between satisfaction with TDM at baseline and treatment experiences and well-being over time. RESULTS AND
interpretationThe participants (median age: 77 years) generally reported high satisfaction with physician- and nurse communication and confidence/trust at baseline (>55% reported the highest satisfaction in all questions), but lower satisfaction with communication regarding how the treatments could affect them - up to 40% reported not having talked about that at all. Treatment experiences and physical- and emotional well-being remained stable over time. Associations were found between satisfaction with TDM at baseline and how they rated the treatment as a whole at six months, and well-being at six and 12 months. In mCRPC, men's TDM preferences need to be explored, and shared decision-making needs to be facilitated when considering treatment. Furthermore, clinicians need to discuss how the treatment might affect patients' everyday lives when discussing life-prolonging treatments with them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.