ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025
Effect of beaver dam analogs (BDAs) on waterborne protozoal pathogens
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Installing beaver dam analogs (BDAs) in freshwater ecosystems is a process-based restoration technique mimicking natural beaver dams to increase stream channel complexity, floodplain connectivity, and hydrological residence time. BDAs have been applied in recent years by resource managers to improve riparian habitats with beneficial effects on ecosystem services, including improved water quality. While BDAs have been shown to reduce suspended sediments and nutrients in surface waters, research is needed to evaluate BDA effects on waterborne fecal pathogens such as IMPORTANCE: Beaver dam analogs (BDAs) are a cost-effective, low-environmental impact technique for stream and riparian meadow restoration that provide a variety of beneficial ecosystem services; however, their impact on waterborne fecal protozoal pathogens has not been evaluated. This study used an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.