ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2025
Sexual and gender minority identity, peer victimization, and suicidality in adolescents: A mediation study using the ABCD Study.
Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of online toxicity on the school ecosystem: an integrative review and conceptual framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Does Stress Explain the Effects of Sexual/Gender Minority Status on Children's Behavioral and Emotional Risk?Open journal of psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSexual and gender minority (SGM) youth are more susceptible to suicidal ideation and attempts compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers. Yet, it is unclear how interpersonal and online victimization experiences account for the elevated suicide risks in this population. This study investigates the extent of peer and cyber victimization among SGM youth and its contribution to their higher risks of suicidal ideation and attempts longitudinally.
methodsData were from the first three waves of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (5,596 9-10-year-old youth; 2,640 [47.2%] female; 3,107 [55.5%] non-Hispanic White). Youth reported sexual and gender identities and experiences of peer (overt, relational, reputational) and cyber victimization. Suicidal ideation and attempts were assessed using youth reports of Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for DSM-5. We used mixed-effects logistic regression to quantify the association between SGM identity reported at waves 1-2 (9-11 years) and suicidal ideation and attempts at wave 3 (11-12 years) and longitudinal mediation analysis to determine whether peer and cyber victimization accounted for these associations.
resultsSGM youth were at greater risk for lifetime suicidal ideation (odds ratio [OR] 4.75, 95% CI 3.74-6.03), lifetime suicide attempts (OR 5.87, 95% CI 3.72-9.28), and current suicidal ideation or attempts (OR 4.94, 95% CI 3.19-7.68) compared to non-SGM youth. SGM youth experienced elevated peer (overt: β = 0.40, 95% CI 0.31-0.49; relational: β = 0.43, 95% CI 0.34-0.53; reputational: β = 0.51, 95% CI 0.42-0.60) and cyber victimization (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.77-3.11). Around 22%-28% of the disparities in current suicidal ideation or attempts were mediated by peer or cyber victimization.
conclusionsSGM youth are disproportionately affected by both interpersonal and online victimization, which are subsequently associated with their elevated suicide risks. Our findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to foster safer school and online environments to reduce suicide among SGM youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.