ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025
Rethinking Screening, and Considering Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in the Clinical Presentation of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): A Commentary Building Upon Presseller et al. (2024).
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Avoidant/Restrictive food intake disorder in adults within the community: A mixed-method study on individual impairment and progression.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Validity and reliability of the Pica, ARFID and Rumination Disorder Interview-ARFID Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q) in Turkish adolescents.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Co-Occurring Weight- and/or Shape-Motivated Restriction in 5747 Adults With Probable Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the adult Nine Item ARFID screen (Persian- NIAS).Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Advancing the Science of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): Six Key Questions.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is increasingly recognized globally, yet its clinical presentation may vary across cultures. This commentary highlights the importance of considering cultural context in the assessment of ARFID. We begin by reflecting on a study by Presseller et al. which examines the utility of the nine-item ARFID screen (NIAS) in a large Swedish sample, finding that the NIAS alone may not adequately differentiate ARFID from eating disorders driven by shape/weight concerns. Building upon this, we broaden the discussion to include the potential comorbidity of ARFID and other eating disorders driven by weight/shape concern, which also requires additional assessment. Furthermore, we explore potential cross-cultural similarities and differences in ARFID presentation, drawing on clinical experience in the Netherlands, Europe, and globally. Factors such as cultural norms surrounding eating, the acceptability of expressing feeding difficulties, and food availability itself may all influence how ARFID manifests. A deeper understanding of these cultural nuances is essential for accurate diagnosis, culturally sensitive treatment approaches, and ultimately, improved outcomes for individuals with ARFID worldwide. The nuanced interplay of cultural factors and diagnostic tools underscores the imperative for tailored approaches in addressing ARFID across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.