Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125889›Full record

ArticleThe Australasian journal of dermatology2025

Sun Safety Policy Implementation in Australian Primary Schools.

Katherine Lissner, Annabel Stevenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine LissnerFellow of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7323-1555
Annabel StevensonFellow of the Australasian College of Dermatology, Dermatologist at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, the Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

The Australasian College of Dermatologists
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesCurrent SunSmart policy in Australia is implemented and reviewed by the Cancer Council using self-reported survey data.

methodsResearchers conducted an external assessment of the implementation of sun safety policies in Australian primary schools by conducting a national survey with questions constructed based on the SunSmart policy. Multivariable binary logistic regressions were performed to understand the relationships between the various sun-safety activities and school characteristics.

resultsWe hypothesised that schools with a higher ultraviolet (UV) exposure rating would perform better due to higher perceived risk. This was true for year-round uniform policy and presence of outdoor sails. Use of sunscreen in Australian schools remains inadequate. Students at more advantaged schools were 2.1 times more likely to use sunscreen, potentially demonstrating a relationship between financial access or awareness, providing an avenue for future funding decisions. Use of sun-protective eyewear remains insufficient, with only 11.1% of schools encouraging use, but Catholic school students are twice as likely to wear sunglasses. Schools in extreme UV areas had the lowest odds ratio of sunglasses use, highlighting a clear target for future intervention. Other important differences in school type were found, including that independent school students have a 58% lower likelihood of wearing SunSmart adherent uniforms.

conclusionsWe found statistically significant inequalities in sun safety behaviours in different school types in Australia, providing utility for future funding and policy decisions.

Indexed as

Health PolicySchoolsSkin NeoplasmsSunburnSunlightSunscreening AgentsAustraliaChildFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleProtective ClothingSurveys and QuestionnairesUltraviolet RaysSunscreening Agentsdermatologyhealth policypopulation healthpublic healthultraviolet light

Identifiers

PMID40125889
PMCPMC12334799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.