Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125776›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Relevance of state-behaviour feedbacks for animal welfare.

Camille M Montalcini, Charles C Driver, Michael T Mendl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camille M MontalciniDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Am Obstberg 1, Radolfzell, 78315, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0785-4717
Charles C DriverDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Binzmühlestrasse 14, Zürich, Switzerland.
Michael T MendlBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X014673/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An animal's behaviour and its state, including its health and affective state, are dynamic and tightly coupled, influencing each other over time. Although both are relevant to the animal's welfare, there has been limited research on their dynamics in welfare studies. Here we aim to: (i) review evidence for feedbacks between state and behaviour that could have beneficial or detrimental consequences for farm animal welfare; (ii) propose ways in which an understanding of such feedbacks could be used to enhance welfare; and (iii) provide practical guidance. We include as state variables any features that could influence the costs and benefits of an animal's behavioural actions, including individual characteristics and aspects of its social environment. We find evidence supporting positive state-behaviour feedback loops in various livestock species, suggesting that these loops could be common in farm settings and have significant welfare implications, such as leading to abnormal behaviours and persistent negative affective states. We suggest (i) estimating within-individual feedback loops to extract individual characteristics for studying differences in welfare; (ii) identifying scenarios where change accelerated by positive feedbacks pushes an animal (or a group of animals) to a new state, also called tipping points; and (iii) generating positive feedback loops to elicit and maintain positive affective states. We end by encouraging use of dynamic models that integrate longitudinal data on animals' behaviour and state to enable exploration of their dynamics, and we provide a practical guide with annotated R code for support. Since the principles and ideas discussed here are relevant to any animals under human care, this approach could foster new perspectives for improving the welfare of all captive animals.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareBehavior, AnimalAnimal HusbandryAnimalsabnormal behavioursaffective stateanimal behaviouranimal welfaredynamic modelsfeedback loopstipping points

Identifiers

PMID40125776
PMCPMC12227790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.