Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125639›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Segregating Sites Enhance Accuracy of Species Abundance Estimates From eDNA.

Kara J Andres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kara J AndresSchool of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4822-7047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species abundance is a fundamental metric in ecology and conservation. Assessing how populations change across space time enables the identification of population trends and informs management and conservation decisions. However, measuring species abundance can be a challenging task, with logistical constraints, sampling biases, and detection limits inhibiting meaningful abundance estimates. Environmental DNA (eDNA) approaches have improved our ability to monitor species presence and biodiversity and may also serve as a tool for measuring species abundance. However, abundance estimates from eDNA typically rely on the correlation between species abundance and the concentration of target species' DNA in a sample, which may be hindered by complex interactions including variable amounts of DNA being shed by different individuals and environmental factors affecting DNA persistence. In this issue, Ai et al. (2025) present a new framework for estimating species abundance from eDNA that uses the amount of genetic diversity detected in a sample, specifically the number of segregating sites, to predict species abundance. The approach was developed and validated using in silico, in vitro, and in situ experiments, demonstrating improved correlations with species abundance compared to estimates based on eDNA concentration. With further improvements in detecting rare genetic variants, this approach has the potential to enhance our ability to quantify species abundance using eDNA.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDNA, EnvironmentalGenetic VariationPopulation DensityDNA, Environmentalenvironmental DNAgenetic variationpopulation dynamicstarget enrichment

Identifiers

PMID40125639
PMCPMC12225696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.