Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125572›Full record

ArticleJournal of periodontology2025

Dental-implant inflamed surface area: A quantification and simulation study.

Yumeng Yan, Praveen Sharma, Jeanie Suvan, Carlota Blanco, Antonio Linares, Yago Leira, Juan Blanco, Francesco D'Aiuto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of periodontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yumeng YanPeriodontology Unit, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3135-9943
Praveen SharmaPeriodontal Research Group, School of Dentistry, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-4842
Jeanie SuvanOral Sciences, University of Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6526-6235
Carlota BlancoPeriodontology Unit, Faculty of Odontology, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela & Medical-Surgical Dentistry Research Group, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1163-3471
Antonio LinaresPeriodontology Unit, Faculty of Odontology, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela & Medical-Surgical Dentistry Research Group, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-5884
Yago LeiraPeriodontology Unit, Faculty of Odontology, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela & Medical-Surgical Dentistry Research Group, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-7276
Juan BlancoPeriodontology Unit, Faculty of Odontology, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela & Medical-Surgical Dentistry Research Group, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9251-513X
Francesco D'AiutoPeriodontology Unit, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8654-935X

Funding

Institute of Health Carlos III in Spain CP23/00071National Institute for Health Research (NIHR); Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeri-implantitis is an oral inflammatory disease with increased incidence across the population as linked to the wide use of dental implants to replace missing teeth. While the recent World Workshop Classifications provided a framework for clinicians to diagnose and assess the severity of peri-implantitis, an objective assessment of the mucosal inflammatory burden around the dental implant is still lacking. Based on the periodontal epithelium surface area (PESA) and periodontal inflamed surface area (PISA) scores previously reported, a study was conducted to explore a similar approach for peri-implant inflammatory surface quantification. The aim of this study was to develop two novel scores of peri-implant mucosal inflammation and their clinical application to help with the quantification of the dental-implant inflamed surface area (DISA).

methodsFormulas were created to quantify the dental-implant surface area (DESA), and then DESA of both tapered and cylinder implants was compared based on a dataset that included probing pocket depth, mucosal recession, and implant morphology parameters. The DISA was subsequently calculated using the epithelial/connective tissue areas multiplied by the proportion of bleeding on probing sites around the implant. The new scores were applied and validated using clinical cases of peri-implantitis.

resultsFirstly, a total of 10,000 dental implants were included in a simulation study to evaluate the performance of the new scores. Under-estimation of the real surface areas around dental implants was less than 2% when using the DESA score for cylinder and tapered dental implants (universal formula is presented). The DISA score was created in the simulations and then applied to 21 participants suffering from peri-implantitis. DESA scores ranged from 54.24 to 400.29 mm

conclusionsTwo novel scores (DESA and DISA) to estimate the peri-implant surface area in health and disease were proposed and applied to clinical cases. The inflammatory surface caused by peri-implantitis could be quantified by DISA with good precision. Future steps could include microbiome assessments and investigation of the association of these scores with the host response and general health status of patients with peri-implantitis. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Peri-implantitis is a common gum disease surrounding dental implants. Although recent guidelines help diagnose it, there's still no clear way to measure the inflammation surface area around implants. We developed formulas to calculate the dental-implant surface area (DESA) and compared them for different implant shapes using data on pocket depth, gum recession, and implant type. We then calculated the dental-implant inflamed surface area (DISA) by multiplying the tissue area around the implant by the proportion of bleeding sites. In our study, we included data from 10,000 implants to test the new scores. The DESA score was very accurate, underestimating the real surface area by < 2%. We then used the DISA score on 21 patients with peri-implantitis. The DESA scores ranged from 54.24 to 400.29 mm

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsPeri-ImplantitisComputer SimulationConnective TissueDental Prosthesis DesignEpitheliumFemaleGingival RecessionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeriodontal IndexPeriodontal PocketSurface PropertiesDental Implantsdental implantsinflammationperi‐implantitis

Identifiers

PMID40125572
PMCPMC12447368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.