ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Machine learning-based approach for identification of new resistance associated mutations from whole genome sequences of
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration from bacterial genomes using a scalable and interpretable machine learning approach.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026Article
- Interpretable multimodal machine learning for diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Analysis of High-Risk Factors for Tuberculosis Retreatment Based on Machine Learning and Latent Class Analysis.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Drug selection based on pan-genomics genetic features ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Currently available methods for the prediction of genotypic drug resistance in Results: Whole genome sequences with known phenotypic drug resistance profiles have been utilized to train XGBoost and ANN classifiers for 5 first-line and 8 second-line tuberculosis drugs. Benchmarking on a completely independent dataset from CRyPTIC database revealed that our method has high sensitivity (90%-95%) and specificity (94%-99%) for five first-line drugs and robust performance for six second-line drugs with a sensitivity of 77%-89% at over 95% specificity. An explainable AI method, SHapley Additive exPlanations, has successfully identified resistance mutations for each drug in a completely automated way. This approach could not only identify known resistance associated mutations in agreement with the WHO mutation catalogue, but also predicted >100 other potential resistance associated mutations for 13 antibiotics in new genes outside the known resistance loci. Identification of new resistance markers opens up the opportunity for the discovery of novel mechanisms of drug resistance. Availability and implementation: Our prediction method has been implemented as TB-AMRpred webserver and command line tool, available freely at http://www.nii.ac.in/TB-AMRpred.html and https://github.com/Ankitapal1995/TB-AMRprd.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.