ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Establishing and popularizing a standard pathological diagnostic model of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens in China.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standardized therapeutic approach for early carcinoma of the digestive tracts. In this regard, the process of histopathological diagnosis requires standardization. However, the uneven development of healthcare in China, especially in eastern and western China, creates challenges for sharing a standardized diagnostic process.
aimTo optimize the process of ESD specimen sampling, embedding and slide production, and to provide complete and accurate pathological reports.
methodsWe established a practical process of specimen sampling, created standardized reporting templates, and trained pathologists from neighboring hospitals and those in the western region. A training effectiveness survey was conducted, and the collected data were assessed by the corresponding percentages.
resultsA total of 111 valid feedback forms have been received, among which 58% of the participants obtained photographs during specimen collection, whereas the percentage increased to 79% after training. Only 58% and 62% of the respondents ensured the mucosal tissue strips were flat and their order remained unchanged; after training, these two proportions increased to 95% and 92%, respectively. Approximately half the participants measured the depth of the submucosal infiltration, which significantly increased to 95% after training. The percentage of pathologists who did not evaluate lymphovascular invasion effectively reduced. Only 22% of the participants had fixed clinic-pathological meetings before training, which increased to 49% after training. The number of participants who had a thorough understanding of endoscopic diagnosis also significantly increased.
conclusionThere have been significant improvements in the process of specimen collection, section quality, and pathology reporting in trained hospitals. Therefore, our study provides valuable insights for others facing similar challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.