ArticleHealth equity2024
Community-Engaged Approach for Health Equity: Enhancing an Active Environment in Michigan.
Article in Health equity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Health: Yes, They Matter-But What Can We Do to Address Them?Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease in physical activity (PA) has been reported in the United States and worldwide. Post-COVID-19, there is thus an urgent need for public health initiatives to revive individuals' interest and support for regular PA. The academic-community partnership between the EMU REACH team and community stakeholders co-designed and implemented an actionable alley activation. The objectives were to (1) Apply a community-based participatory approach for conducting walk audits, and (2) Evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the alley activation. Materials and Methods: The intervention took place in Hamtramck, Michigan and the project team engaged the stakeholders, performed environmental scans, assessed the setting, developed and implemented alley activation, and evaluated the process and outcomes of the intervention. The pilot was assessed using evaluation surveys in multiple languages and speed studies with traffic data. Results: Seventy-two residents and business owners helped implement the alley activation; 54 completed surveys offering feedback about the design and their experiences; and 1,669 residents saw immediate improvements in non-motorized connectivity. The evaluation surveys showed that respondents were positive about the project. For the traffic studies, vehicle speeds were reduced from an average of 28.3 MPH during conflicts with pedestrians to 23 MPH, and total conflicts were also reduced. Conclusion: This quick-build project served as an initial effort for the future implementation of other place-making strategies. The bottom-up community-engaged process has the potential to create a safe, appropriately scaled space that will promote increased walkability in an inner city.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.