Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125365›Full record

ArticleHealth equity2024

Examining Black Birthing People's Experiences with Racism, Discrimination, and Contextualized Stress and Their Perspectives on Racial Concordance with Prenatal Providers.

E Nicole Teal, Aryana Daye, Sarah C Haight, M Kathryn Menard, Karen Sheffield-Abdullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health equity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations for anti-racist, equity-focused NICU family mental health.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Call to Action to Quantify Non-Severe and Severe Maternal Morbidity.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E Nicole TealDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-4605
Aryana DayeCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah C HaightDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
M Kathryn MenardDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Karen Sheffield-AbdullahSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We examine Black birthing people's experiences with racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress and whether those experiences are associated with preference for racially concordant prenatal care providers. Methods: This cross-sectional study is the quantitative component of a larger, mixed-methods study. Data were from initial (August-October 2021) and follow-up (December 2022-January 2023) surveys among self-identified Black and/or African American birthing people who delivered a baby at a university system between 2019 and 2021 and were at least 18 years old. Respondents were 3-32 months postdelivery at the initial survey, which collected data on demographics and the Perceived Racism (ranges 0-430), Perceived Discrimination (ranges 0-36), and Jackson, Hogue, Phillips Contextualized Stress Measure (ranges 0-355) scales. The follow-up survey assessed views on racial and gender concordance and continuity with prenatal providers. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed relationships between scale scores and agreement that racial concordance is important and preferable. Poisson regression assessed whether a top quartile score on scales was related to importance of and preference for racial concordance with providers. Results: Participants ( Conclusion: Black birthing people experience high levels of racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress. The overwhelming majority would choose racial concordance with their prenatal provider if possible.

Indexed as

black or African Americancontextualized stresscontinuity of carediscriminationobstetricspatient–provider interactionprenatal careracial concordanceracism

Identifiers

PMID40125365
PMCPMC11464861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.