Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125361›Full record

ArticleHealth equity2024

Opportunities to Retrofit, Reform, and Reimagine Systematic Reviews for Racial Equity.

Darchelle V Excellent, Bonnie Jones-Hepler, Amelia N Gibson, Megan von Isenburg, Kristin P Tully, Debra H Brandon

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health equity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Darchelle V ExcellentDuke University School of Nursing, PhD Program, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-5535
Bonnie Jones-HeplerDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Amelia N GibsonCollege of Information Studies, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Megan von IsenburgDuke University Medical Center Library, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kristin P TullyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5214-2287
Debra H BrandonDuke University Medical Center Library, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic reviews are used for synthesizing and summarizing published research on any given topic and population of interest. These reviews can expand knowledge within a content area but are limited by place and time values, which can perpetuate bias and systemic racism. This article reports a student's experience with conducting a systematic review on breastfeeding experiences among black birthing parents. We explore the systematic racism perpetuated by the current systematic review search process. We then use McLemore's "Retrofit, Reform, and Reimagine" framework for health equity to propose ways to increase transparency and racial equity through the systematic review process and academic mentoring.

Indexed as

controlled vocabularyliteraturenursing sciencepowerracismsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40125361
PMCPMC11392674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.