ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Fertility-sparing treatment for atypical polypoid adenomyoma.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fertility-sparing management of atypical polypoid adenomyoma in a premenopausal woman: a two-case report and literature review.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological Characteristics of Atypical Polypoid Adenomyoma of the Uterus in Association With Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Endometrioid Carcinoma.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atypical polypoid adenomyoma (APA) has classically been described as a benign lesion of the endometrium; however, recent studies have identified risk of progression to malignant pathology. Standard treatment includes hysterectomy but since many patients with APA are young and desire fertility, uterine-sparing options have been explored. In this study, we examine long-term outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment, including hysteroscopic resection and progesterone therapy, on progression to hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with APA from January 1st 2000 to December 31st 2023 at our quaternary care center. Sociodemographic factors, treatment options (including hysterectomy, hysteroscopy, chemoradiation, and/or hormonal therapy), pathology pre- and post-treatment, and live birth rates, were abstracted from the record. Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to data collection. Results: Sixty-six patients were included in our study time-period. One in three patients (n = 37, 60.7 %) in our cohort opted for fertility-sparing treatment, especially among young (mean age 33.6), nulliparous patients. Most patients underwent hysteroscopic resection (70.8 %), compared to progesterone-only therapy (16.7 % with intrauterine device (IUD) and 12.5 % with oral progesterone). Over two decades, 33.3 % of our cohort progressed to hyperplasia or carcinoma; 29.2 % had persistence of APA pathology; and 33.3 % had resolution of APA. On average, patients progressed within 4.5 years of therapy. There were three births. Discussion: High rates of resolution of APA pathology were observed amongst those undergoing hysteroscopic resection with or without placement of IUD. While not statistically significant due to our sample size, lower rates of resolution were observed among those on hormonal therapy alone, especially oral progesterone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.