Observational studyThe Pan African medical journal2024
Factors associated with
Observational study in The Pan African medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epidemiological characteristics and pathogen profiles of non-The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: leptospirosis is a globally prevalent zoonotic disease that can lead to outbreaks with significant public health implications. In Indonesia, particularly in East Java Province and South Sulawesi, reported cases of leptospirosis have been increasing. Diagnosis typically relies on the Leptospira rapid test and ELISA. This study aimed to assess the association between high-risk populations and Leptospira infection. Methods: this cross-sectional observational study included febrile patients hospitalized at Public Health Centers in Makassar City. Blood samples were collected from eligible participants and tested using both the IgM ELISA and Standard Q Leptospira IgM/IgG rapid test. Results: of the 78 participants, 51% were female, and 64% lived in high-risk areas. The Standard Q Leptospira IgM/IgG test identified 1.3% as positive, while the IgM ELISA detected 2.6% positive cases. The two diagnostic methods showed strong concordance (88.7%). No significant differences were found between infection rates and factors such as age, gender, occupation, or lifestyle. Conclusion: the incidence of leptospirosis in Makassar was low. There was good agreement between the rapid test and ELISA tests. No significant association was observed between Leptospira infection and variables such as age, gender, occupation, or lifestyle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.