ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
High-Risk Patient Refusals in the Prehospital Setting-Clinical and Legal Considerations.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Emergency Medicine Resident and Attending Physician Approval Rates in Online Medical Control: A 10-year Retrospective Analysis.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When emergency medical service (EMS) arrives on the scene, it is estimated that patients end up declining treatment and/or transport around 5% to 10% of the time. When a patient is suspected of having a life-threatening emergency and declines care, these cases are deemed "high-risk refusals," as the subsequent delay in treatment drastically increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, as well as the legal risk for all those involved. These cases warrant careful consideration and deliberate training, not only among EMS professionals and EMS medical directors but also among any in-hospital physicians providing online medical oversight. To mitigate the risk associated with high-risk refusals, EMS systems and emergency departments should have standardized policies and guidelines in place for managing these cases, just as with any other complex, high-risk procedure. State statutes should be referenced and ideally legal counsel should be consulted when developing these guidelines. Checklists and quick references are recommended, and calling online medical supervision should be strongly encouraged. EMS medical directors should also routinely review high-risk refusal charts and include these cases in their ongoing quality improvement and quality assessment efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.