Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125342›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025

High-Risk Patient Refusals in the Prehospital Setting-Clinical and Legal Considerations.

Bryan McNeilly, W Ann Maggiore, Mat Goebel, Michael O'Brien, Nicholas Cozzi, Navin Ariyaprakai, Thomas Lardaro, Michael Weinstock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bryan McNeillyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
W Ann MaggioreDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Mat GoebelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mercy Medical Center - Trinity Health of New England, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael O'BrienDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Nicholas CozziDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Navin AriyaprakaiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers Health, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Thomas LardaroDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Michael WeinstockDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When emergency medical service (EMS) arrives on the scene, it is estimated that patients end up declining treatment and/or transport around 5% to 10% of the time. When a patient is suspected of having a life-threatening emergency and declines care, these cases are deemed "high-risk refusals," as the subsequent delay in treatment drastically increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, as well as the legal risk for all those involved. These cases warrant careful consideration and deliberate training, not only among EMS professionals and EMS medical directors but also among any in-hospital physicians providing online medical oversight. To mitigate the risk associated with high-risk refusals, EMS systems and emergency departments should have standardized policies and guidelines in place for managing these cases, just as with any other complex, high-risk procedure. State statutes should be referenced and ideally legal counsel should be consulted when developing these guidelines. Checklists and quick references are recommended, and calling online medical supervision should be strongly encouraged. EMS medical directors should also routinely review high-risk refusal charts and include these cases in their ongoing quality improvement and quality assessment efforts.

Indexed as

against medical advicebehavioral health emergenciesEMS left on sceneEMS transportshigh-risk refusalmedical decision making capacitytransport refusal

Identifiers

PMID40125342
PMCPMC11927591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.