Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125267›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025

A mixed methods pilot study of a serious illness communication training curriculum among medical residents.

Megan Smith-Uffen, Shilpa Jyothi Kumar, Oren Levine, Daryl Bainbridge, Jeff Myers, Leah Steinberg, Nadia Incardona, Maggie Civak, Hsien Seow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Megan Smith-UffenDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1263-1006
Shilpa Jyothi KumarDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Oren LevineDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Daryl BainbridgeDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jeff MyersDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Leah SteinbergDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nadia IncardonaDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maggie CivakDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Hsien SeowDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is crucial that clinicians develop skillful communication to support patients to improve their illness understanding. A strong understanding of illness is associated with improved quality of life and care that is consistent with patient priorities. Unfortunately, many clinicians lack these skills, and residents, in particular, feel unprepared. The ABCs (All Providers, Better Communication Skills) is a virtual curriculum that teaches core communication skills to facilitate conversations with people who are living with serious illnesses. Objectives: We explored whether the ABCs curriculum increases self-efficacy and addresses self-reported weaknesses in communication training for internal medicine (IM) and family medicine (FM) residents. Design: We conducted a prospective sequential mixed methods cohort study. Methods: Residents completed pre-/post-curriculum self-assessment surveys and a post-curriculum semi-structured interview. Primary outcomes were changes in self-efficacy, whether the curriculum addressed self-identified training needs and feedback on its structure and delivery. Secondary outcomes included feedback on how the modules could be tailored to IM and FM-specific content. Results: Twelve residents completed the study. Most were in IM, female, and aged 26-30 years. Self-efficacy improved significantly as per the SE-12 summative score (mean difference 11.5 points (SD 10.35), Conclusion: The ABCs improved self-efficacy among IM and FM residents. We will use results from this study to inform future iterations of the platform that are tailored to resident-specific learning needs and improving patient-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

communicationmedical educationoncologypalliative careself-efficacyserious illness conversationvirtual training

Identifiers

PMID40125267
PMCPMC11926845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.