Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125241›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease: A Systematic Review.

Meghana Dasari, Rooth V Medapati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meghana DasariDepartment of General Medicine, Rangaraya Medical College, Dr. Nandamuri Taraka Rama Rao (NTR) University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, IND.
Rooth V MedapatiDepartment of Human Genetics, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that presents challenges in early diagnosis, particularly in its prodromal stages. PD is characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, and it remains challenging to diagnose in its early stages. The use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers has shown promise as an adjunctive tool for early detection and monitoring of disease progression. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of CSF biomarkers in PD. We focused on assessing the reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and utility of various CSF biomarkers for the early and accurate diagnosis of PD. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies published from January 2015 to November 2024. Studies were included if they examined CSF biomarkers in human PD patients, and compared to healthy controls or other neurodegenerative diseases. Data on sample size, biomarker types, and diagnostic accuracy were extracted from 34 eligible studies. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using standard tools, and a qualitative synthesis was performed using PRISMA tools. Analysis was done to assess the diagnostic performance of selected biomarkers. The review identified several promising CSF biomarkers, including α-synuclein, neurofilament light chain (NfL), DJ-1, tau, and exosomal biomarkers. Of these, α-synuclein demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy with a sensitivity of 70-85% and specificity of 75-90%. NfL also showed a strong sensitivity (65-85%) for detecting neuronal injury, while DJ-1 exhibited a high specificity for early-stage PD. Multi-biomarker panels, including combinations of α-synuclein, tau, and NfL, demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to individual biomarkers. The variability in the biomarkers' performance was noted across studies, indicating the need for standardization in biomarker assays and further validation through larger, multicenter studies. CSF biomarkers hold significant promise for improving the diagnosis of PD, particularly when used in combination. However, more research is needed to establish standardized protocols and evaluate their role in clinical practice. Multi-biomarker panels show potential as a diagnostic tool, but further investigation is required to confirm their clinical utility and cost-effectiveness in diverse populations. Future studies should focus on the longitudinal tracking of these biomarkers for monitoring disease progression and therapeutic response.

Indexed as

biomarkerscerebrospinal fluiddiagnostic accuracydj-1exosomal biomarkersneurofilament light chainparkinson's diseasesystematic reviewtauα-synuclein

Identifiers

PMID40125241
PMCPMC11929609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.