ArticleCureus2025
A Novel Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Priorities in Emergent Traumatic Brain Injury Anesthesia Care.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has a high mortality rate. Given the limited evidence regarding optimal anesthesia care for patients with TBI, we elicited anesthesiology provider perspectives on priorities for improving emergent TBI anesthesia care through mixed methods. Methods We elicited survey and focus group responses from 177 anesthesiology attendings, nurse anesthetists, and residents. Textual data quantified word characteristics (frequency, repeated words and percentage) by word cloud generation and iterative development of common themes by inductive reasoning. Themes weighted on the frequency of phrases or words were analyzed within another word cloud and classified as structure, process, and outcome measures. A Pareto diagram of themes identified high interest content categories. Results In triangulation, the leading 20% of themes were classified into Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) domains. Twenty-three (13%) survey responses and two focus group data (27 participants) were examined. "Time" was the largest word by word cloud and the most common word (3.57%). Inductive analysis produced 28 content categories ("timeliness" 28.07% most common theme), classified into 11 structure-type, 15 process-type, 2 outcome-type, and no balance quality improvement categories. There were no content categories classified into the balance-type quality measure. A Pareto diagram indicated "timeliness," "standardization," "hemodynamics," and "communication" as important themes. Leading AHRQ domains were "effective, equitable, timely, and safe." Conclusion Word cloud, inductive reasoning, and use of the Pareto diagram identified many opportunities for improving emergent TBI anesthesia care in our institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.