ReviewCureus2025
The Role of Machine Learning in Management of Operating Room: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Construction of performance score dynamic prediction system for clinical departments using explainable machine learning.Health information science and systems · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Catastrophic Health Events in Head and Neck Cancer: A Scoping Review to Inform Risk Prediction.Cancers · 2026Review
- Transforming perioperative care: The current landscape and future trajectory of artificial intelligence in anesthesia-A narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Predicting Pediatric Urological Surgery Duration Through Multimodal Patient-Physician Feature Fusion: Deep Learning Framework Incorporating Clinical Text Embedding.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Development and preliminary evaluation of an AI-enhanced three-dimensional integrated quality model for quality-sensitive indicators in operating room management: a prospective single-center study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- From severity scoring to predictive analytics: the emerging role of AI in neurosurgery.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is a developing technology that enables the analysis and interpretation of large amounts of data. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the available literature on the role of ML in operating room (OR) management. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to search the literature based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 608 studies were found across five different databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore), of which 21 studies were included in this review after removing duplicates and excluding studies based on the pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review highlights how ML has a major impact on surgical case cancellation detection, post-anesthesia unit resource allocation optimization, and surgical case length prediction. Neural networks, XGBoost, and random forests are a few examples of ML algorithms that have shown promise in increasing prediction accuracy and resource efficiency. Nonetheless, issues including privacy concerns and data access remain challenges. The study emphasizes how ML is advancing in surgical medicine and how further innovation is required to fully realize AI's transformative potential for patients, healthcare professionals, and practitioners. Ultimately, integrating AI into OR management holds the potential for improving patient outcomes and healthcare productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.