ArticleCureus2025
Double Trouble: A Case Report of Bilateral Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy After Intrauterine Insemination Along With a Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy (BTP) is a rare variant of ectopic pregnancy (EP). Besides sharing the same risk factors, the similarity in clinical presentation between BTP and EP hamper the diagnosis, often made only during surgery. The management of BTP is complex, raising considerations for fertility-preserving surgery. While evidence is limited, salpingostomy is typically preferred over salpingectomy, as it does not compromise fertility outcomes. The document includes a case report of a 40-year-old woman with a surgically diagnosed and treated BTP five weeks after an intrauterine insemination procedure with ovarian stimulation. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a ruptured right fallopian tube and a mass in the left fallopian tube, despite no prior indications of left-side abnormalities. A right salpingectomy was performed. Post-surgery, a follow-up ultrasound showed a left para-adnexal mass, and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-HCG) levels fluctuated, initially decreasing but later rising, prompting the need for surgical treatment. This case report emphasizes the need for careful management and thorough inspection of both adnexal areas to improve recognition and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.