ReviewCureus2025
Scoping Review of the Published Guidelines for the Management of Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing treatment algorithms in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury.The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2026Article
- Early supraclavicular nerve grafting or distal nerve transfer for restoration of elbow flexion in incomplete adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Subject: Comparing treatment algorithms in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A traumatic brachial plexus injury (TBPI) is a rare yet debilitating condition with a typical incidence of 0.6-3.9 per 100000 annually, predominantly affecting young, economically active males following motorcycle accidents. Delayed diagnosis and treatment are associated with poorer functional outcomes, significant individual disability, and societal burdens, including loss of vocational potential and increased care costs. Individuals in resource-limited settings are particularly vulnerable to receiving suboptimal care. This study aimed to identify and evaluate existing published guidelines for the management of TBPI. A systematic review of literature from nine medical databases, using standardized search methods with results screened for relevance and analyzed using modified Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II-global rating scale (AGREE II-GRS) guidelines to determine quality. The search identified 1163 papers, of which eight met the inclusion criteria: six original research articles, one national guideline, and one departmental guideline. Six studies included treatment algorithms; however, only two categorized nerve transfers by pathology (upper (C5-6 ± C7), lower (C8-T1), or pan-plexus). None provided a sequenced or ordered approach to surgical management. Outcome reporting was inconsistent across studies. A modified AGREE II-GRS analysis indicated that the guidelines were appropriately targeted to relevant professional and patient groups. At present, there are no TBPI guidelines with structured, consensus-based recommendations for managing this condition within acute or secondary care settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our study identified eight published and accessible guidelines with treatment algorithms, but none provided a comprehensive management regimen covering all aspects of TBPI care. Developing such a guideline for LMICs is challenging due to the rarity, variability, and complexity of this pathology. Any guideline designed for this context must account for the health economics, resource availability, logistical barriers, and personnel constraints required to ensure a fit-for-purpose management plan for a TBPI service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.