Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125149›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Assessment of the Usefulness and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Postmortem Procedures.

Anamika Nath, Anupam Datta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anamika NathForensic Medicine, Tezpur Medical College and Hospital, Tezpur, IND.
Anupam DattaForensic Medicine, Agartala Government Medical College and Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital (GBP) Hospital, Agartala, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe increasing reliance on digital platforms for educational purposes has resulted in the widespread availability of medical content, including videos on postmortem procedures on YouTube (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA). The present study analyzed the significance of YouTube videos on postmortem procedures to use as an effective educational tool.

methodsA comprehensive search of YouTube videos on postmortem procedures was conducted using the keyword "postmortem" on a specific date. Videos were included if they were in English, provided content directly related to postmortem procedures, and included audio narration or explanatory text. Data collection and analysis involved evaluating video quality, engagement metrics, and content accuracy using various scales and statistical tests.

resultsThe study analyzed 50 YouTube videos on postmortem procedures, finding that most (n=32, 64%) were of low usefulness, and the majority had low reliability scores. Engagement metrics showed a mean view ratio of 1,500 views per day and an average like ratio of 5.6 but were not predictive of video quality.

conclusionThe majority of YouTube videos on postmortem procedures lack educational value and reliability, emphasizing the need for credible organizations to create high-quality digital resources.

Indexed as

educational videosmedical contentpostmortem proceduresreliabilityusefulnessyoutube™

Identifiers

PMID40125149
PMCPMC11930291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.