Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125125›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

En Bloc Orbitectomy in the Management of Advanced Orbital Cancer: A Retrospective Study of Seven Different Carcinomas.

Lukas Hauer, Peter Tvrdy, Walla Samara, Petr Posta, Zdenek Kasl, Inka Treskova, Jiri Gencur, Omid Moztarzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lukas HauerDepartment of Stomatology, University Hospital Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, CZE.
Peter TvrdyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, CZE.
Walla SamaraDepartment of Stomatology, University Hospital Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, CZE.
Petr PostaDepartment of Stomatology, University Hospital Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, CZE.
Zdenek KaslClinic of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, CZE.
Inka TreskovaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, CZE.
Jiri GencurDepartment of Stomatology, University Hospital Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, CZE.
Omid MoztarzadehDepartment of Stomatology, University Hospital Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, CZE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAn en bloc orbitectomy is one of the most invasive surgical procedures in the orbit, primarily used to remove advanced malignancies, ensure negative resection margins, and local cancer control. This study examines the indications, clinical features, outcomes, and survival rates of patients who underwent this surgery for periocular and orbital malignancies. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective consecutive case series of seven patients with various orbital carcinomas managed with en bloc orbitectomy from 2018-2023 at the University Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic, was conducted. Minor surgeries and other diagnoses were excluded.

resultsThe study included seven patients, with an average age of 68.7 years (range 50-83, median 74). Orbitectomy was part of salvage surgery in two patients and debulking in one. R0 resection was achieved in only 50% of cases; defects were reconstructed with a free anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap in one case and local flaps in others. Therapeutic neck dissection was performed in three patients directly after surgery, in one case 15 months after orbitectomy.

conclusionA thorough examination of indications, patient and tumor features, and reconstructive possibilities should precede an en bloc orbitectomy. Despite being highly invasive, it should be adequately indicated to avoid less invasive surgeries that could complicate radical surgery and impair disease control.

Indexed as

carcinomaen bloc orbitectomyextended orbital exenterationorbital exenterationorbital invasionorbital tumors

Identifiers

PMID40125125
PMCPMC11929589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.