ArticleCureus2025
Saddle Nose Deformity Reconstruction in Yemen: A Prospective Study of the Diced Cartilage Fascia Technique.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSaddle nose deformity presents significant challenges, particularly in conflict-affected and resource-limited settings. The diced cartilage fascia (DCF) technique, which involves wrapping diced cartilage in fascia, has shown potential for addressing these challenges but remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of the DCF technique for saddle nose deformity reconstruction in Yemen.
methodsThis was a prospective study that included 30 patients who underwent saddle nose reconstruction using the DCF technique between January 2020 and January 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative assessments using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scores, A-B line measurements, and complication rates. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative outcomes.
resultsThe study included 30 patients, 12 male (40%) and 18 female (60%), with a mean age of 28.5 years. Significant improvements were observed, with the mean A-B line measurement increasing from 16.75 mm to 21 mm (p < 0.001) and the mean NOSE score improving from 52.8 ± 22.2 to 5 ± 5.1 (p < 0.01). Patient satisfaction was high, with 29 patients (96.7%) reporting excellent outcomes. Postoperative complications occurred in two patients (6.6%). Nasal deviation was noted in one patient (3.3%) and was managed with reoperation, while infection in one patient (3.3%) was treated conservatively.
conclusionsThe DCF technique is a safe, effective, and promising method for reconstructing saddle nose deformities in resource-limited settings. It yields significant functional and aesthetic improvements with high patient satisfaction and minimal complications. Larger studies with extended follow-up are recommended to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.