Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125094›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2025

A comparison of fibrin glue versus suture for anchoring fat pedicles in transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty.

Ryo Kikuchi, Kanjanawan Meeprasertsagool, Duangmontree Rojdamrongratana, Tomoyuki Kashima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryo KikuchiOculofacial Clinic Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Kanjanawan MeeprasertsagoolBangrajun Hospital, Singburi, Thailand.
Duangmontree RojdamrongratanaThammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tomoyuki KashimaOculofacial Clinic Group, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lower eyelid blepharoplasty involves several surgical techniques. In conventional procedures, fat pedicles are temporarily sutured with the external skin or internally fixed with the periosteum to anchor the fat. In this study, we compare a new method, which requires no sutures, of anchoring fat using fibrin glue to the conventional way of temporarily suturing with external skin. Methods: We retrospectively collected data to identify 127 patients who underwent transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty with fat transposition to correct tear troughs. The patients were divided into two groups: 55 patients had the repositioned fat anchored with sutures and 72 patients had the fat anchored using fibrin glue. We focused on the score of postoperative complications multiple times. Results: In terms of skin discoloration, 57.14 % of the patients in the suture group exhibited Grade 2 changes and 42.85 % reached Grade 3. In contrast, only 36.36 % of the patients in the fibrin glue group reached Grade 2, with the majority (54.54 %) showing mild Grade 1 discoloration, and no cases reaching Grade 3. For eyelid tension, no patients in the fibrin glue group experienced severe Grade 3 tension, compared to 2.04 % of the patients in the suture group. Additionally, severe Grade 3 contusions appeared in 71.42 % of the patients the suture group but only in 36.36 % of the patients in the fibrin glue group. Conclusions: Among the patients who underwent transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty with fat transposition, the use of fibrin glue produced substantially lowered the severity of skin discoloration and reduced hematoma tension compared to sutures.

Indexed as

Fat repositioningFibrin glueLower eyelid blepharoplastySkin sutures

Identifiers

PMID40125094
PMCPMC11926615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.