Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125026›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025

F-18 FDG PET/CT Clinical Service Trends in Korea from 2018 to 2022: A National Surveillance Study.

Jaesun Yoon, Heejin Kim, Do Hyun Woo, Seung Yeop Chae, Ji Heui Lee, Inki Lee, Ilhan Lim, Byung Il Kim, Chang Woon Choi, Byung Hyung Byun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jaesun Yoon *Department of Biostatistics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Heejin Kim *Strategic Planning Team, Department of Strategic Planning and Coordination, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Do Hyun WooDepartments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Yeop ChaeDepartments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Heui LeeDepartments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Inki LeeDepartments of Nuclear Medicine, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), Korea Cancer Center Hospital, 75 Nowongil, Nowon Gu Seoul, 139-706 Republic of Korea.
Ilhan LimDepartments of Nuclear Medicine, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), Korea Cancer Center Hospital, 75 Nowongil, Nowon Gu Seoul, 139-706 Republic of Korea.
Byung Il KimDepartments of Nuclear Medicine, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), Korea Cancer Center Hospital, 75 Nowongil, Nowon Gu Seoul, 139-706 Republic of Korea.
Chang Woon ChoiDepartments of Nuclear Medicine, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), Korea Cancer Center Hospital, 75 Nowongil, Nowon Gu Seoul, 139-706 Republic of Korea.
Byung Hyung ByunDepartments of Nuclear Medicine, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), Korea Cancer Center Hospital, 75 Nowongil, Nowon Gu Seoul, 139-706 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1146-1916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the trends and disparities in the utilization of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in Korea between 2018 and 2022, with a focus on disease classification, patient demographics, and regional distribution. Methods: This national surveillance retrospective study uses data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database, which includes all FDG PET/CT examinations conducted in Korea from 2018 to 2022. Disease classifications, cancer types, age groups, gender, and geographic regions were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Utilization rates per 100,000 population were calculated for regional comparisons. Results: FDG PET/CT utilization increased by 25.4%, from 174,885 examinations in 2018 to 219,377 in 2022. Older age groups (60 years and above) accounted for the majority of examinations, with males undergoing more examinations than females. Oncology remained the primary indication, with lung, colorectal, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma leading in examination numbers. The number of examinations performed on patients aged 60 and above increased at a higher rate compared to those under 60. Significant geographic disparities were found, with Seoul reporting the highest utilization rate (1,114.3 examinations per 100,000 population), while Gyeongbuk exhibited much lower rate (26.2 examinations per 100,000 population). Conclusions: This study highlights the growing utilization of FDG PET/CT in Korea, particularly among older adults, with significant gender differences in cancer types. The findings also reveal disparities in FDG PET/CT utilization across regions, indicating varying access to advanced imaging technology.

Indexed as

FDG PETHealth Insurance Review and Assessment ServiceHIRAKoreaPET/CT utilization

Identifiers

PMID40125026
PMCPMC11923350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.