Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40125019›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2025

Assessing the utility of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs) in providing referred sensations in a functional task in a virtual environment.

Jake D N Kanetis, Michael A Gonzalez, Alex K Vaskov, Paul S Cederna, Cynthia A Chestek, Deanna H Gates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jake D N KanetisDepartment of Robotics, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105 USA.
Michael A GonzalezDepartment of Robotics, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105 USA.
Alex K VaskovDepartment of Plastic Surgery at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 USA.
Paul S CedernaDepartment of Plastic Surgery at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 USA.
Cynthia A ChestekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105 USA.
Deanna H GatesSchool of Kinesiology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 USA.

Funding

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for Restoring Individual Finger Movement in People with Upper Limb AmputationsR01NS105132 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHESTEK, CYNTHIA ANNE · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals who use upper limb prostheses receive limited feedback from their devices. Researchers have attempted to elicit sensation through direct stimulation of peripheral nerves or through stimulation of reinnervated skin or muscle. Previous research found that electrical stimulation of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs) elicited sensations that were referred to the phantom hand. The purpose of this study was to determine if this sensation could be used to improve performance of a functional task. Two participants with upper limb loss completed the Box and Blocks Test in a virtual environment under four feedback conditions on a single day of testing. These conditions included no feedback, vibration triggered by object contact, and two conditions where RPNIs were electrically stimulated upon object contact. For the RPNI conditions, one was non-somatotopic, meaning the RPNI sensation was referred to an area on the phantom hand and the other was somatotopic, where the referred sensation and virtual sensor were collocated. Participants moved more blocks with somatotopic feedback to a moderate effect. Both participants expressed a preference for the somatotopic sensation, noting that it made their movements feel more natural. Overall, this study demonstrates that RPNI-elicited sensation has the potential to improve performance in functional assessments.

Identifiers

PMID40125019
PMCPMC11928010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.