ArticleChildren and youth services review2025
Identifying family engagement priorities in youth residential treatment settings: A group concept mapping study.
Article in Children and youth services review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of the Family Engagement in Residential Care Measure.Journal of public child welfare · 2025Article
- Research on the construction of a Chinese indicator system for college students' multidimensional health.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Residential treatment (RT) settings serve youth with severe mental health challenges, often requiring more intensive intervention than outpatient services. Despite the recognized importance of family engagement in improving youth outcomes, there is limited understanding of which family engagement strategies are most valued within RT settings. This study aimed to develop a framework to enhance family engagement in RT by identifying and prioritizing strategies based on their importance and feasibility. Utilizing group concept mapping (GCM), the study gathered and analyzed data from 40 participants, including family members and RT staff across the United States. Participants brainstormed ideas, sorted them into thematic clusters, and rated them on importance and feasibility. The analysis revealed eight distinct clusters representing critical aspects of family engagement in RT, and 44 strategies were rated highly for both importance and feasibility, emphasizing areas like parent peer support, robust communication, and comprehensive discharge planning. The findings underscore the need for improved communication, greater family involvement as active team members, and extended support during and after discharge from RT. Notably, parent-peer support emerged as a critical component. This research provides a framework for understanding and implementing family engagement strategies in RT settings. The prioritized strategies can inform policy and practice to enhance family support and improve youth outcomes in RT. Future research should focus on the practical application of these strategies and the continued evaluation of their impact on families and youth in RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.