ArticleCancer management and research2025
The Safety and Efficacy of Anticancer Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Special populations are not enrolled in randomized clinical trials, and their safety and efficacy of anticancer therapy are not well described. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of anticancer therapy in breast cancer (BC) patients with cirrhosis. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study (1:5) to assess the adverse events (AEs) morbidity and mortality of anticancer therapy in BC patients with cirrhosis based on a review of patients' medical records. Results: We included 26 BC patients with cirrhosis and 130 matched BC patients without cirrhosis. Postoperative morbidity was higher in the group with cirrhosis (26.9% vs 6.9%, P = 0.007) when postoperative mortality was not significance (3.8% vs 0%, P = 0.167). Liver toxicity (73.1% vs 26.9%, P < 0.001) was more frequent in the group with cirrhosis. The incidence of disruption and mortality during chemotherapy was higher in the group with cirrhosis (46.2% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001 and 15.4% vs 0%, P = 0.001, respectively). The 2-year recurrence rate and 2-year metastasis rate were higher in the group with cirrhosis (19.0% vs 3.8%, P = 0.022 and 23.8% vs 6.9%, P = 0.028). Cirrhosis was the risk factor for liver metastasis (OR: 17.326, 95% CI: 2.164-138.707, P=0.007). Conclusion: It is safe for BC patients with compensated cirrhosis to accept surgery. But they are vulnerable to AEs, disruptions and death during chemotherapy and have poor prognosis. Multidisciplinary cooperation before therapy and closely monitoring AEs during therapy are critical. Attention should be given to optimize the prognosis of special BC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.